Case Reviews

Case review | The value of contemporaneous reports – tipping the scales in a ‘he said/she said’ case

Applications for orders to stop bullying by Banfield and Stolz [2026] FWC 717. This Fair Work Commission case confirms that confrontational or condescending communication will not always constitute workplace bullying within the meaning of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Case review | The value of contemporaneous reports – tipping the scales in a ‘he said/she said’ case Read More »

Case review | What documents must an employer disclose during a workplace investigation?

Souza-Connell v Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd [2026] FWC 1572. In this decision, Virgin Australia was required under its enterprise agreement to hand over witness interview records and statements relied on to formulate misconduct allegations – a timely reminder about investigation clause drafting.

Case review | What documents must an employer disclose during a workplace investigation? Read More »

Case review | Regulators have their eye on psychosocial risks in workplace investigations

Secretary, NSW Department of Education v SafeWork NSW (No 2). This NSW Industrial Relations Commission decision shows that safety regulators are enforcing duties on employers to keep employees safe from psychological harm during workplace investigations, with improvement notices issued to address psychosocial risks.

Case review | Regulators have their eye on psychosocial risks in workplace investigations Read More »

Case review | A pattern of behaviour or pattern of failure? What investigators can learn from this FWC decision

Paladino v The University of Melbourne [2026] FWC 559. This Fair Work Commission decision is a reminder that a thorough investigation cannot rescue a disciplinary process built on a weak evidentiary foundation, that fails to put all allegations to the employee, or that substitutes for performance management conversations.

Case review | A pattern of behaviour or pattern of failure? What investigators can learn from this FWC decision Read More »

Case review | Learnings from a recent QIRC sexual harassment decision

Loquias v The Star Entertainment Group and Dwyer [2026] QIRC 023. This Queensland Industrial Relations Commission decision highlights that criminal convictions relevant to workplace conduct can be given substantial weight, and that employers can investigate conduct outside the workplace as part of risk management.

Case review | Learnings from a recent QIRC sexual harassment decision Read More »

Case review | Investigation integrity under the spotlight in recent FWC unfair dismissal case

Haslam v SAE Institute Pty Limited [2025] FWC 3827. This decision highlights the importance of investigators maintaining independence and resisting pressure to change findings without reasonable justification, and the need for clear separation between the roles of investigator and decision-maker.

Case review | Investigation integrity under the spotlight in recent FWC unfair dismissal case Read More »

Case review | Can engaging with employees with poor mental health be unfair? Questions posed by a recent FWC ruling

Wilson v Services Australia [2025] FWC 3328. The Fair Work Commission found that continued engagement with an unwell employee about workplace concerns worsened his condition, and that accepting his resignation without proper consideration of his mental state constituted dismissal at the employer’s initiative.

Case review | Can engaging with employees with poor mental health be unfair? Questions posed by a recent FWC ruling Read More »

Scroll to Top

Add Your Heading Text Here