Case Reviews

Case review | What documents must an employer disclose during a workplace investigation?

Souza-Connell v Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd [2026] FWC 1572. In this decision, Virgin Australia was required under its enterprise agreement to hand over witness interview records and statements relied on to formulate misconduct allegations – a timely reminder about investigation clause drafting.

Case review | What documents must an employer disclose during a workplace investigation? Read More »

Case review | Regulators have their eye on psychosocial risks in workplace investigations

Secretary, NSW Department of Education v SafeWork NSW (No 2). This NSW Industrial Relations Commission decision shows that safety regulators are enforcing duties on employers to keep employees safe from psychological harm during workplace investigations, with improvement notices issued to address psychosocial risks.

Case review | Regulators have their eye on psychosocial risks in workplace investigations Read More »

Case review | A pattern of behaviour or pattern of failure? What investigators can learn from this FWC decision

Paladino v The University of Melbourne [2026] FWC 559. This Fair Work Commission decision is a reminder that a thorough investigation cannot rescue a disciplinary process built on a weak evidentiary foundation, that fails to put all allegations to the employee, or that substitutes for performance management conversations.

Case review | A pattern of behaviour or pattern of failure? What investigators can learn from this FWC decision Read More »

Case review | Learnings from a recent QIRC sexual harassment decision

Loquias v The Star Entertainment Group and Dwyer [2026] QIRC 023. This Queensland Industrial Relations Commission decision highlights that criminal convictions relevant to workplace conduct can be given substantial weight, and that employers can investigate conduct outside the workplace as part of risk management.

Case review | Learnings from a recent QIRC sexual harassment decision Read More »

Case review | Investigation integrity under the spotlight in recent FWC unfair dismissal case

Haslam v SAE Institute Pty Limited [2025] FWC 3827. This decision highlights the importance of investigators maintaining independence and resisting pressure to change findings without reasonable justification, and the need for clear separation between the roles of investigator and decision-maker.

Case review | Investigation integrity under the spotlight in recent FWC unfair dismissal case Read More »

Case review | Can engaging with employees with poor mental health be unfair? Questions posed by a recent FWC ruling

Wilson v Services Australia [2025] FWC 3328. The Fair Work Commission found that continued engagement with an unwell employee about workplace concerns worsened his condition, and that accepting his resignation without proper consideration of his mental state constituted dismissal at the employer’s initiative.

Case review | Can engaging with employees with poor mental health be unfair? Questions posed by a recent FWC ruling Read More »

Case review | Flawed workplace investigation leads to constructive dismissal

Sewell v dnata Airport Services Pty Limited [2025] FWC 2823. The Fair Work Commission awarded approximately $36,500 in compensation after finding a company’s handling of a sexual harassment complaint was so flawed it left the employee with no choice but to resign.

Case review | Flawed workplace investigation leads to constructive dismissal Read More »

Case review | Bullying not always ‘serious misconduct’

Frost v Ambulance Victoria [2025] FWCFB 94 KEY TAKEAWAY A Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has held that a finding of bullying in a workplace investigation will not automatically amount to serious misconduct for disciplinary purposes. It will be a question of degree. The case A paramedic challenged a disciplinary sanction transferring

Case review | Bullying not always ‘serious misconduct’ Read More »

Scroll to Top

Add Your Heading Text Here